Discuss, speak, listen, reflect upon, and process this historic election together. Intra-network Online debate resolved: All nations have a right to nuclear weapons november 14, 2016, 10:00am Bard College, old Henderson 303 Members of the bard College debate Union, the bard College berlin Debate team, the Al Quds Bard Debate Union, and Smolny college debate team. Debate workshop citizen Science january 23, 2017, 7:00pm Bard College, campus Center Red room Introduction to the bard Debate Union for First year Students. New debaters welcome and encouraged to attend! 6th Annual Middle School/High School Debate tournament at Bard College february 17, 2017, 8:30am-3:15pm Bard College, olin lc 115 Debate topics for the tournament include:. . Resolved: Social media does more harm than good for the distribution of news. Resolved: Elected politicians should be paid the median wage in their country.
Should homework be given on weekends?
Co-sponsored by the plan bard Debate hiring Union and the bard-West point Exchange. bpi public Debate resolved: The president of the United States should be elected by popular vote september 23, 2016, 1:00pm Eastern ny correctional Facility public-style debate against Brown University. This is the sixth debate hosted by the bard Debate Union at Eastern ny correctional Facility. Screening Presidential Debate september 26, 2016, 9:00pm Bard College, weis Cinema join members of the bard Debate Union to watch the first presidential debate. Co-sponsored by the bard Debate Union and Election@bard. Screening vice-Presidential Debate October 4, 2016, 9:00pm Bard College, weis Cinema join members of the bard Debate Union to watch the vice-presidential debate. Screening Presidential Debate October 9, 2016, 9:00pm Bard College, weis Cinema join members of the bard Debate Union to watch the second presidential debate. Public Debate resolved: The rapid rise of safe space rhetoric on college campuses has done more harm than good October 18, 2016, 7:00pm Bard College, campus Center mpr opening event for the hannah Arendt Center Conference real Talk: Difficult questions about Race, sex and Religion. Edu/con2016 Screening Presidential Debate October 19, 2016, 9:00pm Bard College, weis Cinema join members of the bard Debate Union to watch the third and final presidential debate. Roundtable the 2016 Presidential Race October 29, 2016, 5:00pm Bard College, Olin Auditorium Faculty members Jonathan Becker (Vice President for Academic Affairs, Associate Professor of Political Studies, and Director of the center for civic Engagement) and Walter Russell mead (James Clarke chace Professor of Foreign Affairs. Open Discussion 2016 Presidential Election Results november 9, 2016, 5:00pm Bard College, Olin 303 join members of the bard Debate Union for a discussion about the 2016 Presidential Election results.
Resolved: The United States dates Federal government should provide no-cost higher education for all American citizens. Resolved: Artificial intelligence will do more harm than good. Two students and one faculty/staff member from each of Bards six network campuses (Al Quds Bard, American University of Central Asia, bard College Annandale, Bard College berlin, European Humanities University, and Smolny college) will join together for two days of lectures, workshops, and debates. All conference participants will then participate in the. Petersburg Open Debate tournament at Smolny college on March 17-18. Public Debate resolved: Bard should not invite speakers with extremist political views to campus April 3, 2018, 6:30pm Following several events over the past year, bard community members have been left asking whether or not speakers with extremist views should be invited to campus. Join us for a student-run public debate on this exciting and controversial Bardian topic! Bpi public Debate resolved: The United States should nationalize its water resources April 27, 2018, 1-3pm Eastern ny correctional Facility public-style debate against the us military Academy at West point. This is the ninth debate hosted by the bard Debate Union at Eastern ny correctional Facility.
There will also be a practice debate based around the topics of political protest and civil disobedience. Intra-network Online debate this house believes that governments should set up, support, and fund state-backed media organizations with the aim of providing impartial, balanced news. Feb 19, 2018, 8:00am. Bard College, old Henderson 303. Debate team members from Bard Network campuses Al Quds Bard, American University of Central Asia, and Bard College will debate online. 7th Annual Middle School/High School Debate tournament at Bard College. March 2, 2018, 8:30am-3:15pm Bard College, olin Auditorium Debate topics for the tournament include:. Resolved: Individuals should be required to pass a civics test in order to vote.
The case for and Against
Roundtable trump and short American Foreign Policy. October 21, 2017, 2:45pm, bard College, Olin Auditorium. Faculty members Jonathan Becker (Vice President for Academic Affairs, Associate Professor of Political Studies, and Director of the center for civic Engagement) and Walter Russell mead (James Clarke chace Professor of Foreign Affairs and the humanities) join members of the bard Debate Union for. Intra-network Online debate this house opposes the privatization of water. November 13, 2017, 8:00am, bard College, old Henderson 303. Workshop middle School/High School Debate. November 18, 2017, 11:00am-3:00pm, bard College, olin Humanities building, bard Debate Union members together with the red hook high School Debate Club will run a workshop for area students and teachers focused on starting debate clubs, recruitment, debate training tools and skills, and a full.
Bpi public Debate resolved: Race-based affirmative action in college and university admissions should be eliminated. December 1, 2017, 1:00pm, eastern ny correctional Facility. Public-style debate against Morehouse college. This is the eighth debate hosted by the bard Debate Union at Eastern ny correctional Facility. Workshop mlk, civic Engagement, and Debate. January 14, 2018, 1:30pm, olin Humanities building, moon room, a student-run workshop, as part of Bards mlk day of Engagement, for current Bard students to learn about the bard Debate Union, about debate opportunities on campus, and about argumentation.
Co-sponsored by the bard Debate Union, the hannah Arendt Center, the center for civic Engagement, and the bard-West point exchange. For more information about this years Hannah Arendt Center Conference, visit:. Edu/con2018, roundtable topic tba, date/time tba, bard College, Olin Auditorium. Faculty members join members of the bard Debate Union for a family weekend Faculty-Student roundtable discussion. Intra-network Online debate topic tba, november 12, 2018, 8:00am, bard College, old Henderson 303. Debate team members from Bard Network campuses Al Quds Bard, bard College, bard College berlin, and Smolny college will debate online.
Bpi public Debate topic tba, date tba, eastern ny correctional Facility. This is the tenth debate hosted by the bard Debate Union at Eastern ny correctional Facility. Spring 2019 events coming soon! Public Debate resolved: Representative democracy has failed. October 11, 2017, 6:00pm, bard College, campus Center mpr. Opening event for the hannah Arendt Center Conference crises of Democracy: Thinking in Dark times (October 12-13, 2017). This debate will feature both the bard and West point debate teams on mixed teams.
Pro s And Con
I was candid, the dean wrote. I called it the way i saw. I tried to focus not on Horowitzs person or character but on his published words. I tried to do my homework, i tried to support every claim with evidence—and in doing so i believed, and continue to believe, that I was showing respect for the audience, for the event, for the organizers and, yes, for. Homework /hoʊmwk/ noun, learner's definition of homework noncount 1 : work that a student is given to do at home — compare listing classwork 2 : research or reading done in order to prepare for something — used in the phrase do your homework. Public Debate topic tba, october 10, 2018, 6:00pm, bard College, campus Center mpr. Opening event for the hannah Arendt Center Conference citizenship and civil Disobedience (October 11-12, 2018). This debate will feature both the bard and West point debate teams.
It was nice to see reed engage political issues that inhabit mainstream discourse but to do so on our own boisterous and unconventional terms, wrote the senior from North Carolina, adding that he thought the dean had won the debate. As rider anyone who has ever taken a class with Steinberger well knows, wrote goldstein, he is surgical, he is thorough, and he is damning. The charlatan was thus no match for the Philosopher King. But an op-ed by peter Tweig, a senior from Ohio, protested that Steinbergers approach had breached reeds honor principle. I believe that ad hominem attacks of the sort employed by our dean on Horowitz are fundamentally incompatible with the aims of a liberal education and the kind of dispassionate inquiry which it seeks to promote, tweig wrote. A week later, leslie zukor, a sophomore from Washington State, asked in an op-ed why events degenerated as they did, answering that the left and the right both hold beliefs.that are not amenable to contrary evidence. Even if we dont change our opinions, we could all do better, myself included, to step back and take a moment to comprehend the other side. Finally, steinberger weighed in with an essay reiterating that Horowitzs advocacy of an academic bill of rights is the antithesis of serious, rational, intellectual discourse, and denying that his own presentation had amounted to an ad hominem attack.
excoriating both speakers for ignoring the rules. That is when the real debate began—in campus hangouts, email, and the ensuing four issues of the. Was the dean fair in labeling Horowitz a political pornographer prone to citing technical truths in order to tell substantive lies? Was Horowitzs spontaneous (and ranting) 20-minute rebuttal to Steinbergers blistering 40-minute opening statement over the top? Should a provocateur and an intellectual have been matched in the first place? A sophomore from Hawaii, dustin Freemont, took both speakers to task in a november. Quest story headlined Academic Debate descends into Chaos, citing Steinberger for playing to the audience and pulling"s out of context, and Horowitz for exposing his conservative bias for everything from race to gender to class. A week later in Reflections on kaul, Adam Goldstein found perverse pride in the chaos.
Eu data subject Requests. Peter Steinberger, steinberger. Horowitz: The Great Debacle? David Horowitz, the prospect of a lively exchange of ideas across the political divide attracted presentation about 500 students, faculty, and visitors to kaul Auditorium in november for what the parent family weekend schedule called a debate on Academic Freedom. At one rostrum: provocative radical-turned-neoconservative author/lecturer david Horowitz proposing an academic bill of rights to shield collegians from liberal bias. At the other: Peter Steinberger, dean of reeds faculty and Ellis Professor of Political Science and Humanities. Moderating: Charles Hinkle, portland civil liberties attorney and ordained minister.
Literary Theory and Criticism Notes, english Literature