Posted by: akjmicro september 7, 2009 1:26 pm posted by: wonderwaleye september 7, 2009 1:01 pm posted by: BarbaraDurkin september 7, 2009 9:54 am posted by: BritheGreat september 7, 2009 9:21 am posted by: merf-1 september 7, 2009 8:58 am posted by: azken september. Jones proclaiming himself to be a communist! Posted by: bizlady08 september 6, 2009 11:37 pm let's start at the beginning. Even though your snarky attitude and condescension don't really deserve a response, i'll give you some of the info you requested. "Jones had planned to move to washington, dc, and had already landed a job and an apartment there. But in jail, he said, "I met all these young radical people of color - i mean really radical, communists and anarchists. And it was, like, 'this is what I need to be a part. Although he already had a plane ticket, he decided to stay in San Francisco.
Autumn of the Black Snake: The Creation of the
Here's one: how can the english authorities both claim that the pentagon flight 'disintegrated' on impact, but yet they have fingerprints identifying the on-board victims? Or, how about the miraculous finding of a hijacker passport amid the apocalyptic rubble of ground zero? Or, how did wtc7 demolish in the exact manner lot of a controlled demolition if even jet fuel theories don't apply, since a jet didn't hit it? Another simple question: do the 'collapses' (not really collapses but pulverizations, but let's use your wording) look at all at least similar to controlled demolition? Do they bear all the features of controlled demolition? If you are honest, you'd have to say 'yes and saying yes, why wouldn't you consider that hypothesis at all? Why make up convoluted theories that are untested and un-demonstrated just to preserve your sense of what is or isn't 'beyond the pale'. Did you know, even fema, in the official commission report, rejects outright the commonly held 'pancake theory' as unsound! You see, as I was, you are emotionally attached to a version of the story that is more comfortable: easy to hate, clear enemies (the entire world of Islam a place in the world to bomb for revenge (Afghanistan, or even fraudulently, iraq a preserved. So, the us never has nefarious forces (except, apparently, democrat commie liberal freaks and Israel is amazing and can never do wrong, and Arabs are all suicidal religious maniacs. Try engaging these questions; they won't just go away-and-you might find that something subtle will turn in you until eventually things will show their disharmony and you will have to be an integral being again and voice disgust at the madness instead of swimming.
There are perfectly legitimate bases for suspicion about the bush government, since it so quickly and parts thoroughly exploited the 9/11 attacks to advance bush's policy intentions versus Iraq, and because the 9/11 attack itself so perfectly fit the stated need of the neocon/pnac agenda for. These suspicions, whether they are right or wrong, will remain unresolved, because we can't have a serious discussion of them, based on the facts we can actually establish, without the defenders of orthodoxy immediately resorting to ridicule and evasion. I'd still like to know what really happened on 9/11, and why. The official account still fails to account for too many established facts, not to mention reported observations from presumptively reliable sources that, while they haven't been definitively verified, appear to have substance, and call for examination and explanation. Alas, these are questions one is apparently discouraged from asking; in any case, they will not be answered. Posted by: Iconoblaster september 8, 2009 1:51 pm posted by: lehill september 8, 2009 12:52 pm posted by: ani1 september 8, 2009 12:50 pm posted by: scrivener50 september 8, 2009 11:42 am posted by: Common_Cents1 september 8, 2009 9:40 am posted by: wonderwaleye september. I have yet to hear a single argument besides 'ad hominem' empty attacks that can't easily be debunked from any anti-911 truth folks. And not one hard question has been answered. I know from what I speak, years ago i was skeptical until I did the hard reading and research to try to answer some questions and challenge my own thought.
American Airlines also said they didn't have airphones in 2001 on their planes. Here's a link to an article about qualcomm saying in 2004 that 'cell phone calls will finally paper be possible from planes ml "Let's roll" becomes state propaganda when you look at it, and it worked-to a large degree, the country is largely still asleep re:911. These and hundreds of other questions need answers. Hence, my being a 'nutjob' truther. posted by: akjmicro september 8, 2009 10:55 pm posted by: BrianValentine september 8, 2009 7:05 pm posted by: wonderwaleye september 8, 2009 3:41 pm posted by: BrianValentine september 8, 2009 2:52 pm i guess I'm not really surprised that it has come to the point. There were and are unanswered questions about the terrorist attack, and serious inconsistencies, even demonstrable errors, in the official version of events (which is to say, the one contained in the 9/11 Commission report). Some of the challenges to the official account may have depended on fuzzy thinking or facts, or were subsequently refuted, but the defenders of the orthodox version of events constantly conflated the silly claims along with those that had substance. So that to question the official account in any respect made one a "conspiracy theorist who would be immediately tarred like a believer in ufos or something. Well 9/11, even by the official account, was a conspiracy (maybe critics need to look up the word "conspiracy and there are still unanswered rational and relevant questions about the official account of that conspiracy, and its consequences.
No, i don't think Cheney could be interpreted as being in hesitation to shoot down a civilian plane. Don't forget, the wtc towers had already been hit. Why would he hesitate with that knowledge? It would have been triple red alert, and I think they would have taken no chances. And what were the 'orders' that Mineta witnessed? If they were 'shoot the plane that didn't happen, so either the orders were disobeyed, (unlikely) or those weren't the the in that case the order would have been a stand down. In an interesting twist, the zaccharias moussaoui trial debunked the idea that Barbara Olson called her husband on a cell phone from Flight.
Bdsm library - thesis
Next: Today on the sunday talk Shows. Add 44 to your Site, be the first to know when there's a new installment of The Trail. This widget is easy to add to your Web site, and it will update every time there's a new entry on The Trail. Get This Widget posted by: Annon5 september 10, 2009 1:50 am posted by: Annon5 september 10, 2009 1:31 am posted by: wonderwaleye september 9, 2009 2:22 pm hi akzen, your question is a fair e simple truth is: "I don't know what exactly hit the. There are plenty of rather perverse inconsistencies in the offical account. The flight path reported word by unique the 911 Commission doesn't agree with any known eyewitness accounts, not in a subtle way, but in major ways.
There are witnesses who are even aviation experts who call the offical account utter bulls* t! Do you know, someone in the pentagon must know. And with all the cameras surrounding that building, why no released footage. By all means, pentagon authorities, clear up the question once and for all, release the footage that unambiguosly shows Flight 77 hitting the pentagon! Why don't they release anything? Why do they confiscate and obfuscate? Is that equivalent to 'cover-up'?
Lamar Alexander (r-tenn.) and former house Speaker Newt Gingrich declined to criticize jones directly, though Alexander did question why the Obama administration had appointed so many issue czars. "I don't think he's the issue alexander said. "I think the czars are the issue.". Former Vermont governor Howard dean rallied to jones' defense, saying he had signed the controversial 9-11 "Truther" petition by mistake. "I think he was brought down. It's too bad dean said.
"I think it's a loss for the country.". Staff writers Anne. Kornblut and Juliet Eilperin contributed to this report. Posted at 12:30 am. Sep 6, 2009, category: Cast of Characters, share This: Technorati. Tag in, digg This, previous: Obama Offers Steps to make retirement savings Easier.
"I Know you're in There somewhere" Fight - tv tropes
John Cornyn (r-texas chairman of the national Republican Senatorial Committee, wrote on his Twitter account, "Van Jones has.". Jones's resignation was foreshadowed Friday when Gibbs gave only tepid write support for him when pressed, saying that Jones "continues to work for the administration." he declined to state that the adviser enjoyed the full support of President Obama, instead referring questions to the environmental council. Jones, a towering figure in the environmental movement, had worked for the White house council on Environmental quality since march. He was a civil-rights activist in California before turning his focus to environmental and energy issues, and he won wide praise before joining the Obama administration for articulating a broad vision of a green economy democrats could embrace. White house adviser david Axelrod, on nbc's "Meet the Press said Sunday he had not spoken with the president about Jones. "The political environment is rough, and so these things write get magnified. But the bottom line is that he showed his commitment to the cause of creating green jobs in this country by removing himself as an issue, and I think that took a great deal of commitment on his part he said. On fox news Sunday, sen.
Org that questioned whether Bush administration officials "may indeed have deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, perhaps as a pretext for war" and the other for using a crude term to describe republicans in a speech he gave before joining the administration. His one-time involvement with the bay area radical group Standing Together to Organize a revolutionary movement (storm food which had Marxist roots, had also become an issue. And on Saturday his advocacy on behalf of death-row inmate mumia abu-jamal, who was convicted of shooting a philadelphia police officer in 1981, threatened to develop into a fresh point of controversy. Fox News Channel host Glenn Beck launched the drive against Jones and all but declared war on him after a group Jones founded in 2005, colorofChange. Org, led an advertising boycott against Beck's show to protest his claim that Obama is a racist. Mike pence (R-Ind.) called on Jones to resign Friday, saying in a statement, "His extremist views and coarse rhetoric have no place in this administration or the public debate.". Bond (r-mo.) urged Congress to investigate jones's "fitness" for the position, writing in an open letter, "Can the American people trust a senior White house official that is so cavalier in his association with such radical and repugnant sentiments?" On Saturday, sen.
announcement that Jones was stepping down came minutes after midnight Sunday morning. "On the eve of historic fights for health care and clean energy, opponents of reform have mounted a vicious smear campaign against me jones said. "They are using lies and distortions to distract and divide.". He continued: "I have been inundated with calls - from across the political spectrum - urging me to 'stay and fight.' but I came here to fight for others, not for myself. I cannot in good conscience ask my colleagues to expend precious time and energy defending or explaining my past. We need all hands on deck, fighting for the future.". Jones, who joined the administration in March as special adviser for green jobs at the ceq, had issued two public apologies in recent days, one for signing a petition in 2004 from the group 911Truth.
Operation Clambake is registered as a non-profit organisation in Norway, state. Cast of Characters, van Jones, pictured at the national Clean Energy summit.0 on August 10 in Las Vegas. 9/6/09, by Scott Wilson and Garance Franke-ruta. White house environmental adviser, van Jones resigned late saturday after a simmering controversy over his past statements and activism erupted into calls for his ouster from Republican leaders on Friday. White house spokesman Robert Gibbs on Sunday explained the resignation on abc's "This week with george Stephanopoulos saying, "Van Jones decided was that the agenda of this president was bigger than any one individual." The president does not presentation endorse jones's past statements and actions, "but. A white house official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss a personnel matter, said Jones's past was not studied as intensively as other advisers because of his relatively low rank. Jones's position did not require senate confirmation, so he avoided the kind of vetting Cabinet officials were subjected. In addition, as an adviser to the council on Environmental quality, rather than to Obama directly, his past was not reviewed to the same degree as the more senior "assistants to the president" and other top advisers inside the west Wing.
The hungarian Rise And Fall Of Sebastian Gorka - buzzfeed
Disclaimer: i, andreas Heldal-Lund, am alone responsible for Operation Clambake. I speak only my own personal opinions. Critics of the Church of Scientology (cos including wikipedia which is npov, are free to use images and text on this site that are made by me if proper credits are given. Pick up the stick! A special thanks goes to all contributors, credits are placed where due except when authors real have request anonymity. Dianetics and Scientology are trademarks of the religious Technology centre (RTC). These pages and their author are not connected with cos or rtc, or any others organization residing under their corporate umbrella.